UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number 333-14229

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (772) 403-2992

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨  No þ

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF MARCH 31, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

INFORMATION SYSTEM ASSOCIATES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Information Systems Associates, Inc. (Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on May 31, 1994. The Company provides Mobile Data Center Management™ systems and turnkey data center management solutions to customers. Our products and services include data center asset/inventory management, data center management software and data center data collection. Utilizing its proprietary and patented technology, OSPI® (On Site Physical Inventory®), customers are able to manage data centers on a mobile basis, bringing data center management out of the office and into the data center.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be a cash equivalent.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Most significant estimates in the accompanying financial statements include the allowance on accounts receivable, valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of warrants issued with debt, valuation of beneficial conversion features in convertible debt, valuation of stock-based awards, valuation of long-lived assets for impairment and the measurement and useful lives of property and equipment. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Concentrations

Cash Concentrations

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses related to these balances. There were no amounts on deposit in excess of federally insured limits at the date of this report.

Significant Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

A significant portion of revenues is derived from certain customer relationships. The following is a summary of customers that each represents greater than 10% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and total accounts receivable at March 31, 2013:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

We measure our financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Amounts recorded for subordinated notes payable, net of discount, and loans payable also approximate fair value because current interest rates available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities are substantially the same.

4

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

We follow accounting guidance for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost).

The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1:

Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

Inputs, other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) are computed by dividing net (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The dilutive EPS adds the dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and other stock equivalents. As of the date of this report, outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,020,000 shares of stock and outstanding options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of stock were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share because the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. These warrants and options may dilute future earnings per share.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 Financial Statements to conform to current 2013 presentation.  The reclassifications include labor costs for services and amortization of capitalized software costs which were formerly recorded in general and administrative expenses and are now recorded in cost of sales.

Recent Issued Accounting Standards

We have implemented all new accounting standards that are in effect and that may impact our consolidated financial statements and do not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a net operating loss and cash used in operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 of $149,399 and $67,702 and the working capital deficit, stockholders’ deficit and accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2013 was $776,524, $ 900,874 and $4,853,118 respectively. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and raise capital. During 2013 the management has arranged with a related party for working capital up to $200,000 to finance on-going projects. Our management is also currently engaged in discussions with the capital markets to raise additional funds for expansion including software development and marketing. These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

5

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

NOTE 3 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND FACTORING

In December 2011 the Company entered into an agreement with a Factoring company whereby the Company will assign, in the Factor’s sole discretion, selected accounts receivable to the Factor in exchange for initial cash funding ("factor advances") for up to 80% of the factored receivable. The minimum 20% reserve held back by the Factor is released after collection of the account receivable by the Factor. The company pays a 3% factor fee for each factored receivable. Since the factoring agreement provides for full recourse against the Company for factored accounts receivable that are not collected by the Factor for any reason, and the collection of such accounts receivable are fully secured by substantially all assets of the Company, the factoring advances have been treated as secured loans on the accompanying balance sheets. The total accounts receivable factored in during the period ending March 31, 2013 was $163,240. The factor fees paid during the period ending March 31, 2013 was $5,755. Total outstanding accounts receivable factored as of March 31, 2013, which is included in Accounts Receivable on the accompanying balance sheets, was $70,476.

The Company has total Accounts Receivable as follows:

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The Company has total Property and Equipment as follows:

Depreciation expense of $1,429 was recorded for the period ended March 31, 2013.

6

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE – Related Parties

The Company’s notes payable to related parties classified as current consist of the following:

———————

* interest rate per month

On August 30, 2012 a company that is majority owned by a foreign investor and personal friend of the Company’s President and COO, entered into an arrangement with the Company to loan up to $200,000 on a revolving basis at an interest rate of 2.5% per month based on purchase orders or invoices that have not been previously factored. The initial deposit for this loan came from the Company’s President and COO pursuant to the investor, who is a foreign national, setting up an appropriate entity to handle further transactions. Further, the Company’s President and COO has personally guaranteed the loan. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 there was outstanding principal balance of $151, 965 and $85,755, respectively. Accrued interest at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $15,643 and $8,669, respectively.

On June 27, 2012 an individual whom the Company’s President and COO has significant influence over, loaned the Company $10,000 at an interest rate of 1.5% interest per month payable monthly. Between July 13, 2012 and July 24, 2012 the related party advanced an additional $15,000. On January 1, 2013, the Company received $19,400 from this related party in exchange for forty-five day original issue discount note with a face value of $20,000 and a maturity date of February 15, 2013. The original discount interest rate was 2% per month. On February 15, 2013, the related party agreed to extend the note for an additional thirteen days, through March 1, 2013 on the same terms and conditions. The original discount interest of $200 was paid to the lender on February 15, 2013. On March 1, 2013, the related party agreed to extend the note for an additional month, through March 31, 2013 on the same terms and conditions. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 there was outstanding principal balance of $45,000 and $25,000, respectively. Accrued interest at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $333 and $407.

On May 31, 2012 the Company’s President and COO made a $30,000 short-term advance to the Company. During the second and third quarter, additional advances totaling $50,975 were made. No interest was due on these short-term advances. At December 31, 2012 the advances had been paid in full. During the third quarter the Company deferred $71,012 of payroll for this officer and recorded the amount as a non-interest bearing loan payable. The Company paid down the loan by $39,788 leaving a balance at year-end of $31,224. During the third quarter the officer used his personal credit card to purchase a Company computer in the amount of $1,378 which is recorded as a loan payable. The Company pays these loans as sufficient funds become available. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 this officer had an outstanding loan balance of $20,209 and $32,602, respectively

On May 28, 2011, the Company’s Chairman and CEO advanced the Company $25,000 in exchange for a promissory note, bearing an annual interest of 6% and a repayment term of seven months. On January 1, 2012, the note was extended for a further 12 months. As of December 31, 2012 the note and accrued interest was paid in full. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company reclassified $30,265 of accounts payable balances due to the CEO, to loan payable - officer. These balances were a result of Company expenses charged to the CEO’s personal credit cards. The Company was previously paying the credit card companies directly for these expenses incurred. During the third quarter 2012 the company recorded accrued payroll for this officer. The resultant net pay was converted to a non-interest bearing loan payable in the amount of $54,682. The Company pays these loans as sufficient funds become available. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 this officer had an outstanding loan balance of $73,668 and $85,668, respectively

7

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTE PAYABLE – Shareholder

The Company’s notes payable to shareholder classified as current at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consists of the following:

———————

* Interest rate per month

On January 11, 2012 a shareholder loaned the Company $35,000 at 3% interest per month for one year. On April 13 2012, the shareholder loaned additional principal to the Company in the aggregate amount $25,000. On June 28, 2012, the Company made a $10,000 principal payment on the note. In January 1, 2013, the Company entered into a new agreement with a shareholder to rollover an existing line of credit in the amount of $50,000. The original line of credit was for a total of $60,000 and ISA repaid $10,000 of that obligation during 2012. The new note maintains similar terms and conditions but with a reduction in the monthly fee from 3% to 2.5%. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the principal balance on the note was $50,000 and $50,000, respectively. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the accrued interest on the note balance was $1195 and $2432, respectively.

NOTE 7 – NOTE PAYABLE, CONVERTIBLE – Related Party

On June 20 and 28, 2012, a related party who is an affiliate of the President and COO, made a non interest bearing short-term loan to the Company in the amount of $60,000. On August 15, 2012, this loan was exchanged for a one year original issue discount convertible note with detachable warrants. The face value of the note is $66,000. The $6,000 original issue discount is expensed as interest over the term of the note. The convertible note payable is convertible into 1,320,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.05 per share. The Company has valued the beneficial conversion feature attached to the note using the intrinsic value method at a relative fair value of $28,571. The five-year warrants to purchase 1,320,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 were valued at a relative fair value of $31,429 based on using the Black-Scholes pricing model assuming a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility of 462.61%, and a risk free interest rate of .102%. The beneficial conversion feature and the relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a discount to the note to be amortized to interest expense over the term of the note term. The net value of the note at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $40,513 and $24,953, respectively.

NOTE 8 – NOTES PAYABLE, CONVERTIBLE – Shareholders

On July 18th, 2011 the Company received $125,000 from a shareholder in exchange for a one year original issue discount convertible note with detachable warrants. The face value of the note is $137,500. The $12,500 original issue discount is expensed as interest over the term of the note. The convertible note payable is convertible into 1,375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.10 per share. The Company has valued the beneficial conversion feature attached to the note using the intrinsic value method at $62,500. The five-year warrants to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 were valued at their relative fair value of $62,500 based on using the Black-Scholes pricing model assuming a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility of 347.62%, and a risk free interest rate of 1.46%. The beneficial conversion feature and the relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a discount to the note. On February 24, 2012, the shareholder made an additional investment of $62,500 (see following paragraph for

8

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

details). As a condition for this further investment, the conversion price of the note issued on July 18, 2011 was reduced to $.075 and an equivalent reduction in the exercise price of the warrants was executed. This modification qualifies for treatment as a debt extinguishment for financial accounting purposes and all remaining discounts were expensed. The exercise price exceeded the stock price on the date of modification; therefore no beneficial conversion value was recorded for the new note. On March 6, 2012 the shareholder converted this note in the amount of $137,500, at the contractual conversion rate of $.075, into 1,833,333 shares of common stock (see Note 14).

On February 24, 2012, the Company received an additional $62,500 from the shareholder in exchange for a one year original issue discount convertible note with detachable warrants. The face value of the note is $68,750. The $6,250 original issue discount is recorded as debt discount and expensed as interest over the term of the note. The convertible note payable is convertible into 1,375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.05 per share. The Company has valued the beneficial conversion feature attached to the note using the intrinsic value method at $24,606. The five-year warrants to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 were valued at a relative fair value of $37,894 based on using the Black-Scholes pricing model assuming a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility of 462.61%, and a risk free interest rate of .89%. The beneficial conversion feature and the relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a discount to the note. On February 24, 2013, this note became due and payable. ISA is technically in default though no written notice has been received from the shareholder. The Company is in discussions with the shareholder regarding either converting the note or extending it for further periods. As of the date of this report discussions continue. The net value of the note at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $68,750 and $58,579 respectively.

On May 11, 2012, the Company received an additional investment of $12,500 from a shareholder in exchange for a one year original issue discount convertible note with detachable warrants. The face value of the note is $13,750. The $1,250 original issue discount is expensed as interest over the term of the note. The convertible note payable is convertible into 275,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.05 per share. The Company has valued the beneficial conversion feature attached to the note using the intrinsic value method at $1,545. The five-year warrants to purchase 275,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 were valued at the relative fair value of $4,970 based on using the Black-Scholes pricing model assuming a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility of 462.61%, and a risk free interest rate of .096%. The beneficial conversion feature and the relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a discount to the note. The net value of the note at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $12,857 and $10,963, respectively.

NOTE 9 – NOTE PAYABLE – OID – LONG TERM LIABILITY – Shareholder

On July 15th, 2011 the Company received $125,000 from a shareholder in exchange for a one year original issue discount convertible note with detachable warrants. The face value of the note is $137,500. The $12,500 original issue discount is recorded as debt discount and expensed as interest over the term of the note. The convertible note payable is convertible into 1,375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.10 per share. The Company has valued the beneficial conversion feature attached to the note using the intrinsic value method at $62,500. The five-year warrants to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 were valued at the relative fair value of $62,500 based on using the Black-Scholes pricing model assuming a dividend yield of 0%, an expected volatility of 347.62%, and a risk free interest rate of 1.46%. The beneficial conversion feature and the relative fair value of the warrants are recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a discount to the note. The net liability of $63,664 was included as a current liability at December 31, 2011. On July 15, 2012, the maturity date, the $137,500 note was exchanged for a new two year original discount secured note. The note is secured by the Company’s intellectual property, notably the patent for OSPI. In exchange for the security the investor agreed to waive the conversion rights and cancel the warrants issued with the original note. On February 8, 2013, the Company entered into an Inter-creditor Agreement with Liquid Capital Exchange, Inc. (the Company’s factor) and a shareholder who has a $165,000 original discount note dated July 15,

9

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

2012, secured by the intellectual property. The Inter-creditor Agreement resolves a definition dispute concerning UCC’s filed by both parties to protect their collateral. A part of this agreement calls for the shareholder to receive 5% of all factor advances to the company until such time the shareholder loan is paid in full. Additionally, until the loan is paid, if there is a trigger notice (loan is due or is called), the factor will pay to the shareholder all factor holdback amounts after collection of the related accounts receivable, less any factor fees. The face value of the note is $165,000. The $27,500 original issue discount is expensed as interest over the term of the note. The net value of the note at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $147,219 and $143,866, respectively.

NOTE 10 – LOANS PAYABLE - INSURANCE

On August 31, 2012, the Company incurred short term financing of $5,794 for the purchase of Directors’ & Officers’ insurance. The interest rate on the financing was 6.96% and will mature July 2013. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the balance on the note incurred for insurance financing was $1,774 and $3,517, respectively.

NOTE 11 – NOTE PAYABLE – LINE OF CREDIT

The Company has a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank. The line of credit provides for borrowings up to $40,000. The balance as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $40,000 and $37,028, respectively. The interest rate is the Prime Rate plus 3%. The CEO of the Company is the personal guarantor. The line of credit is due on demand with an expiration date of April 30, 2014.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating lease

On April 25, 2011, the Company entered into a 3 year escalating lease agreement for 1,352 square feet commencing July, 2011. The monthly rental rate is $1,800, $1,920 and $2,040 for the lease years ending July 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The Company incurred $1,664 in leasehold improvements prior to occupancy and paid a security deposit of $1,690.

On September 19, 2011, the Company entered into a 1 year sublease for 2,000 square feet in Las Vegas, Nevada. The sublease commenced on October 15, 2011 and requires monthly payments of $3,000. A security deposit of $3,000 was paid to the landlord.

Rent expense for the periods ending March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 were $5,732 and $15,214, respectively.

NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTIES

As of March 31, 2013 and December 13, 2012 there were various notes and loans payable to related parties (see Notes 5 and 7).

10

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

NOTE 14 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock based payments for services

On January 2, 2012, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock valued at their fair value of $10,000 to an independent director in payment of director fees for the coming year which was fully expensed as of December 31, 2012.

Common stock issued for the conversion of notes

On March 6, 2012, a convertible note in the amount of $137,500 was converted into 1,833,333 shares of common stock at the contractual conversion rate $0.075 per share (see Note 8).

NOTE 15 – STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

Warrants

Following is a summary of warrants outstanding:

On August 15, 2012, warrants to purchase 1,320,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share were issued to a related party in conjunction with a convertible note. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with a dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 462.61%, risk free interest rate of .102% and a term of 5 years.

On May 11, 2012 warrants to purchase 275,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share were issued to an existing accredited investor in conjunction with a convertible note. As consideration for this further investment, the 250,000 existing warrants with a strike price $.10 were cancelled and reissued with a strike price of $0.075 per share. The new and existing warrants were both valued on the modification date using the Black-Scholes model with a dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 462.61%, a risk free interest rate of 0.89% and a term of 5 years and 3 years, respectively. There was no additional expense resulting from the modification.

On February 24, 2012 warrants to purchase 1,375,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share were issued to an existing accredited investor in conjunction with a convertible note. As consideration for this further investment, the 1,250,000 existing warrants with a strike price $.10 were cancelled and reissued with a strike price of $0.075 per share. The new and existing warrants were valued on the modification date using the Black-Scholes model with a dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 462.61%, a risk free interest rate of 0.89% and a term of 5 years. There was no additional expense resulting from the modification.

11

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

Options

Following is a summary of options outstanding:

On January 1, 2013 the Company granted options to purchase 650,000 shares of common stock to its independent directors. The options have an exercise price of $0.02 per share, a five-year term, vest on January 1, 2014¸ and are subject to continuing service as a director. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes model using a volatility of 508.21%, an expected term of 5 years and an interest rate of 0.76%. The options are valued at $14,500 and will be recognized as expense over the requisite service period.

On August 2, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 options valued at $0.04 per options for a total of $10,000 to its President and CFO. The options vest equally every six months over a three year period. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes model with a dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 462.61%, risk free interest rate of 0.61% and a term of 5 years. The expense in 2012 was not material.

On August 2, 2012, the Company issued 100,000 options to its new Chief Operating Officer. The options vest equally every six months over a three year period. The options were valued at $0.04 per option using the Black-Scholes model with a dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 462.61%, risk free rate of 0.61% and a term of 5 years. On December 21, 2012, the COO was terminated. As part of the settlement agreement, all 100,000 options immediately vested and the Company recognized $4,000 total expense.

12

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OUR COMPANY

We were incorporated in Florida in 1994 to engage in the business of developing software for the financial and asset management industries. We are currently engaged and plan to continue in the sale of asset management software for corporate information technology data centers and networks. ISA is a "solution provider" positioned to develop and deliver comprehensive asset management systems large data center assets.

We deliver turnkey software and service solutions that give large corporations control of their IT assets. Our mobile asset solution addresses data center equipment inventory, space utilization, power and connectivity management. In conjunction with our data center asset management solutions, ISA also offers state of the art asset data collection and audit services focusing on the enterprise IT infrastructure. The data collection and audit services are based on our solution OSPI® which provides mobile data center asset management on a handheld device. It dramatically reduces the time and effort spent managing changes to the data center or performing asset inventories while greatly improving the accuracy of asset management data. It is the only mobile asset management system purposely built for use in the data center. It puts a full mobile solution within the data center manager's control, allowing data to be managed while in the data center at the time and place changes occur.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in this report.

For the Three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to March 31, 2012

Revenues

Revenues were $208,862 and $75,595 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The revenues increase for 2013 due to an increase in professional services revenue, software licensing revenue and customer service revenue by $62,326, $61,087, and $9,854 respectively.

Cost of Sales

Costs of sales were $98,536 and $45,107 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in 2013 cost of sales is primarily due to an increase in professional services cost and customer services cost of $53,372 and $442, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in software licensing costs of $385.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $209,706 and $221,852, respectfully. The decrease in operating expenses resulted primarily from a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $18,895, offset by an increase in salary and benefits of $791 and an increase in professional fees of $5,958.

Loss before other Income (Expense)

We had a loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 of $99,380 and $191,364, respectfully. The decrease in the loss resulted from a $79,838 increase in gross profit.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $44,264 and $127,840 respectfully. The decrease in interest expense resulted from decrease of amortization of interest expense of $91,631 associated with original issue discount notes, the beneficial conversion feature and warrants issued associated with our convertible notes offset by an increase in notes payable interest of $8,055.

13

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Factor Fees

Factoring fees for the three months ending March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $5,755 and $3,781, respectfully. The $1,972 increase was due to an increase in the number of invoices factored.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was $149,398 as compared with a net loss of $322,987 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. Loss before other income (expense) decreased by $91,984, partially offset by a decrease in other expense of $81,604, due to decrease in interest on additional borrowing. Net loss per common share was $0.00 and $0.01 for the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Weighted average common shares outstanding for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were 30,599,417 shares and 30,268,816 shares, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows used in operations was $67,702 for the three month period ending March 31, 2013 and cash flow provided by operations was $23,216 for the three month period ending March 31, 2012.

Cash flows used in operations during the period ended March 31, 2013 were attributable to a net loss of $149,399 and an increase in accounts receivable of $90,374, offset by depreciation and amortization expense of $1,429, prepaid expenses $2,458, amortization of original issue discount, beneficial conversion value and warrant discounts of $30,978, options issued for services of $3,250, increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses $91,831, and an increase in deferred revenue of $42,125.

Cash flows used in operations during the period ended March 31, 2012 were attributable to a net loss of $322,987, offset by depreciation and amortization expense of $11,708, prepaid expenses $17,500, amortization of original issue discount, beneficial conversion value and warrant discounts of $124,153, decrease in accounts receivable of $122,885, increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses $23,525.

During the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we experienced no effect from investing activities.

Cash flows provided by financing activities was $69,325 for the period ended March 31, 2013. These cash flows were provided by net proceeds from related party and shareholder notes of $60,525, net proceeds from line of credit of $2,962, and net proceeds from factors, net of repayments of $11,916; offset by insurance premium repayment of $2,198 and a repayment of checks written in excess of cash balances. Cash flows provided by financing activities was $27,703 for the period ended March 31, 2012. These cash flows were provided by net proceeds from related party and shareholder notes of $97,500, net proceeds from line of credit of $1,475, and insurance premium proceeds of $227: offset by net repayment of factors, net of proceeds of $71,498.

As of May 14, 2013 we had cash on hand of $4,250.  During 2013 the management has arranged with a related party for working capital up to $200,000 to finance on-going projects.  If we are unable to generate revenues sufficient to support our operations we will require additional debt or equity financing to meet the working capital needs of the Company. Our management also currently plans to raise additional funds for expansion including software development and marketing.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no-off balance sheet contractual arrangements, as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments. We believe that the determination of the carrying value of our long-lived assets, the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets and valuation of share-based payment compensation are the most critical areas where management’s judgments and estimates most affect our reported results. While we believe our estimates are reasonable, misinterpretation of the conditions that affect the valuation of these assets could result in actual results varying from reported results, which are based on our estimates, assumptions and judgments as of the balance sheet date.

14

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition" and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-605-25 which addresses Revenue Recognition for the software industry. The general criteria for revenue recognition under ASC 985-605 for our Company which sells software licenses which do not require any significant modification or customization is that revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable.

The Company generates revenue from three sources: (1) professional Services (consulting & auditing); (2) software licensing with optional hardware sales; and (3) customer service (training & maintenance/support).

For sales arrangements that do not involve multiple elements:

(1)

Revenues for professional services, which are of short term duration, are recognized when services are completed.

(2)

Through the date of this report, software license sales have been one time sales of a perpetual license to use our software product and the customer also has the option to purchase third party manufactured handheld devices from us if they purchase our software license. Accordingly the revenue is recognized upon delivery of the software and delivery of the hardware, as applicable, to the customer.

(3)

Training sales are one time upfront short term training sessions and are recognized after the service has been performed.

(4)

Maintenance/support is an optional product sold to our software license customers under one year contracts. Accordingly, maintenance payments received upfront are deferred and recognized over the contract term.

Arrangements with customers may involve multiple elements of the above sources. Training and maintenance on software products will generally occur after the software product sale while other services may occur before or after the software product sale and may not relate to the software product.

Each element is accounted for separately when each element has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and there is Company specific objective evidence of selling price of each deliverable. For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables, the Company allocates the total customer arrangement to the separate units of accounting based on their relative selling prices as determined by the price for the items when sold separately. Once the selling price is allocated, the revenue for each element is recognized using the general and specific criteria under GAAP as discussed above for elements sold in non-multiple element arrangements. A delivered item or items that do not qualify as a separate unit of accounting within the arrangement are combined with the other applicable undelivered items within the arrangement. The allocation of arrangement consideration and the recognition of revenue is then determined for those combined deliverables as a single unit of accounting. The Company sells it various services and software and hardware products at established prices on a standalone basis which provides Company specific objective evidence of selling price for purposes of multiple element relative selling price allocation. All elements in multiple element arrangements with Company customers qualify as separate units of account for revenue recognition purposes.

Accounts Receivable and Factoring

Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. In determining the collections on the account, historical trends are evaluated and specific customer issues are reviewed to arrive at appropriate allowances.

The Company accounts for the sale of our accounts receivable to a third party in accordance with ASC 860-10-40-5 “Transfers and Servicing”. ASC 860-10 requires that several conditions be met in order to present the sale of accounts receivable net of related debt in the asset section of our balance sheet. Even though we have isolated the transferred (sold) assets and we have the legal right to transfer our assets (accounts receivable) we do not meet the third test of effective control since our accounts receivable sales agreement requires us to be liable in the event of default by one of our customers. Because we do not meet all three conditions, we do not qualify for sale treatment and our debt incurred with respect to the sale of our accounts receivable is presented as a liability on our balance sheet.

15

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluated the recoverability of its property, equipment, and other assets in accordance with FASB ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, which requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceed the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets or the business to which such intangible assets relate.

Software Development Costs

Internal Use Software

The Company accounts for costs incurred to develop or purchase computer software for internal use in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40 “Internal-Use Software” or ASC 350-50 "Website Costs". As required by ASC 350-40, the Company capitalizes the costs incurred during the application development stage, which include costs to design the software configuration and interfaces, coding, installation, and testing.

Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage along with post-implementation stages of internal use computer software are expensed as incurred. Capitalized development costs are amortized over a period of one to three years. Costs incurred to maintain existing product offerings are expensed as incurred. The capitalization and ongoing assessment of recoverability of development costs requires considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited to, technological and economic feasibility, and estimated economic life.

Software to be sold or leased

Costs incurred in connection with the development of software products are accounted for in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 985-20 Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased or Marketed.” Costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are charged to research and development expense. Software development costs are capitalized after a product is determined to be technologically feasible and is in the process of being developed for market and capitalization ceases after the general release of the software. Amortization of capitalized software development costs begins upon initial product shipment. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over the estimated life of the related product using the straight-line method. The Company evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such software assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software asset.

Software maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost of the software and the related accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts upon retirement of the software with any resulting loss being recorded in operations.

Share-Based Compensation

We follow the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. The fair values of share-based payments are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on weighted average assumptions. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common stock. We have elected to use the simplified method described in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14C to estimate the expected term of employee stock options. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.

The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

16

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Most significant estimates in the accompanying financial statements include the allowance on accounts receivable, valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of warrants issued with debt, valuation of beneficial conversion features in convertible debt, valuation of stock-based awards, valuation of long-lived assets for impairment and the measurement and useful lives of property and equipment. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Recent Issued Accounting Standards

We have implemented all new accounting standards that are in effect and that may impact our consolidated financial statements and do not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information to be reported under this item is not required of smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management carried out an evaluation with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Based on their evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

17

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are a party to, or otherwise involved in, legal proceedings arising in the normal and ordinary course of business. As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any proceeding, threatened or pending, against us which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position. There were no material changes during the first quarter to any pending legal proceedings previously reported.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

The following important factors among others, could cause our actual operating results to differ materially from those indicated or suggested by forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q or presented elsewhere by management from time to time. There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operation may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt absent obtaining adequate new debt or equity financing and achieving sufficient sales levels.

We incurred a net loss of $149,399 and used cash in operating activities of $67,702 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. We anticipate these losses and cash flow deficits will continue for the foreseeable future. We have not reached a profitable level of operations and have negative working capital, all of which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a growing concern. Our continued existence is dependent upon generating working capital. Because of our continuing losses, we have working capital to permit us to remain in business only through June 30, 2013, without improvements in our cash flow from operations or new financing. Working capital limitations continue to impinge on our day-to-day operations, thus contributing to continued operating losses.

If we are unable to raise capital, we may not remain in business.

Other than a revolving loan from a related party which had approximately $27,000 available to borrow from at May 14, 2013, we have no other credit facility or other committed sources of capital sufficient to fund our business plan. We may be unable to establish credit arrangements on satisfactory terms. For that reason, we plan to raise additional funds by issuing convertible notes.  If we are unsuccessful in raising this capital, we may not be able to continue operations.

If we do not generate positive cash flow and earnings or raise additional debt or equity capital, we may not be able to repay our debt and operating payables.

We are not able to repay our debt and old payables from our operating cash flow. Because of the lingering effects of the recession, ongoing financial issues in Europe, difficulties which microcap companies have in raising capital, the lack of available credit for companies like us and our stock price, we may be hampered in our ability to raise the necessary working capital. Even if we do find a source of additional capital, we may not be able to negotiate terms and conditions for receiving the additional capital that are acceptable to us. Any future capital investments may dilute or otherwise materially and adversely affect the holdings or rights of our existing shareholders. In addition, new equity or debt securities issued by us to obtain financing could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock. We cannot give you any assurance that any additional financing will be available to us, or if available, will be on terms favorable to us.

Our Lack of Revenues Makes Evaluating Our Business and Prospects Difficult

Since our inception, we have had limited revenues.  These factors make it difficult to evaluate our growth prospects. In addition, we have incurred significant losses each year.

18

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Potential Fluctuations In Our Financial Results Make Financial Forecasting Difficult.

Factors that may cause fluctuations in our financial results include:

·

General economic conditions as well as economic conditions specific to our industry;

·

Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis in the past and may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include:

·

long sales cycles, which characterize our industry

·

implementation delays, which can affect payment and recognition of revenue;

·

any decision by us to reduce prices for our solutions in response to price reductions by competitors

·

the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to monitoring or expanding our business, operations and infrastructure

·

the timing of, and our ability to integrate, any future acquisition, technologies or products or any strategic investments or relationships into which we may enter

Due to these factors, our quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. In addition, it is likely that in one or more future quarters, our operating results will fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In such event, the trading price of our common shares would almost certainly be materially adversely affected.

Because We Face Significant Competition, We May Not Be Successful.

The market for asset lifecycle management solutions is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. We face significant competition in each segment of our business (sourcing, procurement, enterprise asset management and asset disposition). We expect that competition will further intensify as new companies enter the different segments of our market and larger existing companies expand their product lines.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete with them effectively. If we fail to do so, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

If We Encounter Significant Delays In Product Development, It Would Result In Our Loss Of Revenue.

If we experience significant product development delays, our revenues could be substantially reduced, which would adversely affect our operating results. As a result of the complexities inherent in our software, major new product enhancements and new products often require long development and test periods before they are released. On occasion, we have experienced delays in the scheduled release date of new or enhanced products, and we may experience delays in the future. Delays may occur for many reasons, including an inability to hire a sufficient number of developers, discovery of bugs and errors or a failure of our current or future products to conform to industry requirements. Any such delay, or the failure of new products or enhancements in achieving market acceptance, could materially impact our business and result in a decrease in our revenues.

Our Business Could Be Substantially Harmed If We Have To Correct Or Delay The Release Of Products Due To Software Bugs Or Errors.

Our software products may contain undetected errors or bugs when first introduced or as new versions are released. Errors may result in any of the following:

·

adverse customer reactions

·

negative publicity regarding our business and our products

·

harm to our reputation

·

loss of or delay in market acceptance

·

loss of revenue or required product changes

·

diversion of development resources and increased development expenses

19

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

·

increased service and warranty costs

·

legal action by our customers

·

increased insurance costs

Because Our Industry Is Characterized By Rapid Technological Change, We May Have To Expend Significant Resources To Keep Pace.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements, frequent new service or product introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices. Any of these could hamper our ability to compete or render our proprietary technology obsolete. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to:

·

develop new proprietary technology that addresses the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our existing and prospective customers

·

anticipate and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a timely and cost-effective basis

·

continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our products in response to evolving market demands

·

license leading technologies

We may be required to make substantial expenditures to accomplish the foregoing or to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure.

If we are unable to protect our proprietary technology, our business could be harmed.

Our intellectual property including our patent is our key asset. Competitors may also be able to design around our patent and to compete effectively with us. The cost to prosecute infringements of our intellectual property or the cost to defend our products against patent infringement or other intellectual property litigation by others could be substantial. We cannot assure you that:

·

Future patent applications will result in issued patents;

·

The patent we own will not be challenged by competitors;

·

The patent will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect our technology or provide us with a competitive advantage; and

·

We will be successful in defending against future patent infringement claims asserted against our products.

Both the patent application process and the process of managing patent disputes can be time consuming and expensive. In addition, changes in U.S. patent laws could prevent or limit us from filing patent applications or patent claims to protect our services and/or technologies or limit the exclusivity periods that are available to patent holders. In September 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law and included a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law, including the transition from a "first-to-invent" system to a "first-to-file" system and changed the way issued patents are challenged. These changes may favor larger and more established companies that have more resources than we do to devote to patent application filing and prosecution. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently issued new Regulations effective March 16, 2013 to administer the Leahy-Smith Act. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will ultimately have on the cost of prosecuting our patent applications, our ability to obtain patents based on our discoveries and our ability to enforce or defend our issued patents. However, it is possible that in order to adequately protect our patents under the "first-to-file" system, we will have to allocate significant additional resources to the establishment and maintenance of a new patent application process designed to be more streamlined and competitive in the context of the new "first-to-file" system, which would divert valuable resources from other areas of our business. In addition to obtaining a patent on our technology, we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and trade secrets by entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, corporate partners and, when needed, our advisors. Such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements, and we may not be able to prevent such unauthorized disclosure. Monitoring unauthorized disclosure is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to prevent such disclosure are, or will be, adequate.

20

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

If we are subject to intellectual property infringement claims, it could cause us to incur significant expenses and pay substantial damages.

Third parties may claim that our equipment or services infringe or violate their intellectual property rights. Any such claims could cause us to incur significant expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could require that we pay substantial damages and prevent us from using licensed technology that may be fundamental to our business service delivery. Even if we were to prevail, any litigation regarding its intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations. We may also be obligated to indemnify our business partners in any such litigation, which could further exhaust our resources. Furthermore, as a result of an intellectual property challenge, we may be prevented from providing some of our services unless we enter into royalty, license or other agreements. We may not be able to obtain such agreements at all or on terms acceptable to us, and as a result, we may be precluded from offering some of our equipment and services.

Because our business is sensitive to the overall economic environment, any slowdown in information technology spending budgets could harm our operating results.

There is generally a correlation between a robust business climate and our customer’s information technology budgets. Any significant downturn in our customers' markets or in general economic conditions that results in reduced information technology spending budgets would likely result in a decreased demand for our products and services, longer selling cycles and lower prices, any of which may harm our business.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Because our common stock does not trade on a securities exchange, a number of investors cannot purchase our common stock, which has a depressive effect on our stock price.

Our common stock trades on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board which is not a national securities exchange. As a result of that and our stock price being under $5.00 most institutions cannot buy our stock and brokers generally cannot recommend to investors that they buy our stock. Trading is very limited. Unless an active market for our common stock develops, the price may decline in the future and is not likely to increase.

Because we are subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers cannot generally solicit the purchase of our common stock which adversely affects its liquidity and market price.

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock on the Bulletin Board has been substantially less than $5.00 per share and therefore we are currently considered a “penny stock” according to SEC rules. This designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities.

These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our common stock and therefore reduce the liquidity of the public market for our shares.

Due to factors beyond our control, our stock price may be volatile.

Any of the following factors could affect the market price of our common stock:

·

The resolution of our present liquidity problems;

·

Our announcements of and progress with commercialization of our business;

·

Our failure to generate increasing revenues;

·

Our failure to receive purchase orders;

·

Short selling activities;

·

The loss of key personnel;

·

Our failure to achieve and maintain profitability;

·

Actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations;

21

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

·

Announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products, acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

·

The loss of major customers or product or component suppliers;

·

The loss of significant business relationships;

·

Our failure to meet financial analysts’ performance expectations;

·

Changes in earnings estimates and recommendations by financial analysts; or

·

Changes in market valuations of similar companies.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s time and attention, which would otherwise be used to benefit our business.

We may issue preferred stock without the approval of our shareholders, which could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us and could depress our stock price.

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) may issue, without a vote of our shareholders, one or more additional series of preferred stock that have more than one vote per share. This could permit our Board to issue preferred stock to investors who support our management and give effective control of our business to our management. Additionally, issuance of preferred stock could block an acquisition resulting in both a drop in our stock price and a decline in interest of our common stock. This could make it more difficult for shareholders to sell their common stock. This could also cause the market price of our common stock shares to drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.

An investment in ISA will be diluted in the future as a result of the issuance of additional securities, the exercise of options or warrants or the conversion of outstanding preferred stock.

In order to raise additional capital to meet our working capital needs, we expect to issue additional shares of common stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into common stock from time to time, which could result in substantial dilution to investors. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in raising additional capital.

Because our management do not solely by virtue of their ownership of our common stock control ISA, it is possible that third parties could obtain control and change the direction of our business.

Our officers and directors own approximately 6,700,000 shares of our common stock or 21.9% of the shares actually outstanding. By including shares of common stock which are issuable upon exercise of outstanding options held by them, they beneficially own approximately 6,950,000 shares or 22.7%. A former officer who has an adversarial relationship with our management owns 16.3% of our common stock. For these reasons, a third party could obtain control of ISA and change the direction of our business.

Since we intend to retain any earnings for development of our business for the foreseeable future, you will likely not receive any dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have not and do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future, as we intend to retain any earnings for development and expansion of our business operations. As a result, you will not receive any dividends on your investment for an indefinite period of time.

Because almost all of our outstanding shares are freely tradable, sales of these shares could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.

As of March 31, 2013, we had 30,599,417 shares of common stock outstanding of which our directors and executive officers own approximately 6,700,000 million shares which are subject to the limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. Most of the remaining outstanding shares, including a substantial amount of shares issuable upon exercise of options, are and will be freely tradable.

In general, Rule 144 provides that any non-affiliate of ISA, who has held restricted common stock for at least six months, is entitled to sell their restricted stock freely, provided that we stay current in our SEC filings. After one year, a non-affiliate may sell without any restrictions.

22

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

An affiliate of ISA may sell after six months with the following restrictions:

(i)

we are current in our filings,

(ii)

certain manner of sale provisions, and

(iii)

filing of Form 144.

Because almost all of our outstanding shares are freely tradable and a number of shares held by our affiliates may be freely sold (subject to Rule 144 limitations), sales of these shares could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.

Because we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms, it could have a material impact upon the price of our common stock.

It is not likely that securities analysts of major brokerage firms will provide research coverage for our common stock since the firm itself cannot recommend the purchase of our common stock under the penny stock rules referenced in an earlier risk factor. The absence of such coverage limits the likelihood that an active market will develop for our common stock. It may also make it more difficult for us to attract new investors at times when we require additional capital.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements involving our liquidity and capital raising efforts. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs.  

The results anticipated by any or all of these forward-looking statements might not occur. Important factors, uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are contained in the above Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events or otherwise. For more information regarding some of the ongoing risks and uncertainties of our business, see the Risk Factors and our other filings with the SEC.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

23

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

———————

24

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.

25